Case agreement is not an essential feature of English (only personal pronouns and pronouns with a case mark). A correspondence between these pronouns can sometimes be observed: modern English does not have a particularly large amount of concordance, although it is present. In this regard, the agreement depends on the expected importance and both options are possible depending on the intent of the spokesperson. “Many cars on the road” could refer to the multitude of cars or the situation of many cars that are on the road; High production costs could relate to the costs themselves or to the situation in general. Compared to English, Latin is an example of a very curved language. The consequences of an agreement are therefore: subjects and verbs must agree in numbers for a sentence to make sense. Although grammar can be a bit odd from time to time, there are 20 rules of the subject-verbal chord that summarize the subject fairly concisely. Most concepts of the verb-subject chord are simple, but exceptions to the rules can make it more complicated. The problem with grammar rules, from the point of view of modern linguistics, is that many rules are not absolute.
There are many exceptions to the rules, as we can see here. It may be useful to mark compressed lists of rules like these as bookmarks. In this sentence, there are two clauses, each with its own subject and verb. The subject and verb of the first sentence are singularly: Ruby Roundhouse knew it. The subject and verb of the second sentence are also singularly: the path and war. However, since there are two clauses with two distinct verbs, we must ensure that there is also an agreement in a tense form. As the verb “knew” is tense in the past, the verb “what” must also be stretched in the past. A simple match is evident in the following examples. Such a concordance is also found with predictors: man is tall (“man is great”) vs. the chair is large (“the chair is large”). (In some languages, such as German.
B, that is not the case; only the attribute modifiers show the agreement.) Languages cannot have a conventional agreement at all, as in Japanese or Malay; barely one, as in English; a small amount, as in spoken French; a moderate amount, such as in Greek or Latin; or a large quantity, as in Swahili. This rule of agreement for compound subjects is more violated, especially in familiar English, when the compound subject refers logically or must refer to two things that form a single whole. That is, the composite subject refers to a singular concept. In many cases, the author decides whether the subject represents something singular or pluralistic, depending on the idea to be expressed. For example, a group may act as a whole (singular) or as a group of individuals (plural), and despite many attempts to make them rules, there is no simple rule that covers all cases: whether the subject is a pronoun or complex or as part of an adjective sentence or modified by expressions of kinship or by general knowledge or something that occurs later in the sentence. , then the subject-verb chord can become a little more complicated.